Locate an animal, mimic its expression and movement for two minutes. If there are no other lives around, observe an object and be it for two minutes. Do it regularly. – Apichatpong Weerasethakul via Hans Ulrich Obrist

My name is Paweł or “pav” for short. I am scheming how to improve epistemics and collective coordination using technology. I am currently working at AI Objectives Institute on Talk to The City. I do UI / UX design, wrote AI Revolution 101 and have a background in art. Below are the values and directions I care about.


Overcoming bias

One of the main efforts of my learning is to figure out how to minimize Cognitive Biases. I am sure I suffer from many, especially from the mother of all My-side bias and her children Confirmation bias Hindsight bias Expert trap 🎨 Typical mind fallacy Creator’s bias 🎨. So pleassssse help and send Feedback. What truths about myself people are trying to avoid telling me?

Love and fun

I want to be what loves becoming—what laughs, friends and has fun. But I don’t want to force myself into any particular mold. I want to grow organically that means discovering my intrinsic values and further listening in, distilling, shedding, and figuring what’s mine and what’s not.

Short

“I am sorry that I didn’t have time to write a shorter letter” – Pascal. I try to distill knowledge into as few words as possible. I think this is one of the most important and neglected ideas about knowledge.

Through a “peasant's reasoning”

This is a ****Polish expression meaning to communicate in the simplest possible terms. Knowledge is often a signaling tool—a vehicle for climbing a homo sapiens hierarchy ladder. "Look at my complex vocabulary!", "I belong to this type of people", "I am smart". I feel this force is largely active in our culture and in me. The best trick to counteract it is Richard Feynman’s learning method:

"If you can't explain it simply you don't understand it well enough".

Precise

I will prioritize precision over persuasion. I think the form and the flow of writing is important but it shouldn’t compromise the precision of arguments. I aim to include Epistemic status in my writing and include my confidence tags

Not normal write

Stylistically things may feel off. English is not my native language. On top of that I am also softly dyslexic. I believe it’s a feature not a bug, thanks buddy!—as dyslexic brains are organized in a way that maximizes strength in making big picture connections at the expense of processing speed and parsing fine details)

Long-term

New knowledge is both a blessing and a curse. It is a blessing when you compare medieval to contemporary findings in medicine, ethics, physics. It is also a curse because we have a Recency bias . I try to resist the new and select the knowledge that has a long expiry date.