This one is interesting because Sanyer doesn't want to bike and first says it's about locking it in different places and the hassle of remembering about picking it up — but then seems to shift towards if bike theft wasn't an issue, he may consider biking
April 2, 2024 2:16 PM (GMT+2)
HarmonyAPP: Starting a new double crux session between @Sofi and @sanyer...
HarmonyAPP:
- Hi, I'm Harmony, your discussion facilitator.
- My role is to help you collaboratively find the cruxes of your disagreement.
- The goal is to discover a double crux, not to debate but to understand.
- Are you both open to the possibility of changing your minds today?
- Please provide a broad overview of what you disagree about.
Sofi: I think sane should start biking but he thinks biking is dumb
HarmonyAPP:
- @Sofi, what are the key reasons you believe biking is beneficial?
- @sanyer, what are your main objections to biking?
sanyer: Biking can be nice, but it isn't that useful when you live near the center, since the public transport is so good.
HarmonyAPP:
- The potential crux seems to be the comparative utility of biking versus public transport in a city center.
- @Sofi, would you change your mind about the benefits of biking if you were convinced that public transport is more useful than biking in the city center?
- @sanyer, if you found out that biking has certain advantages over public transport even in the city center, would that change your view on the usefulness of biking?
Sofi: 'useful' is too vague
sanyer: Yeah, but that depends a lot on the specifics of a person